Paste any contract, NDA, employment agreement, or lease. Get an instant plain-English breakdown with risk score, clause highlights, and side-by-side comparison — completely free.
Upload or paste a contract on the left and we'll surface the risks, obligations, and red flags in seconds.
Red = risky · Blue = caution · Green = fair clause
Compare two versions of a document to find key differences and see whether each draft favours Party A, Party B, or neither.
The Doc Analyzer is designed to help users get a fast first-pass understanding of contracts and other legal documents. You paste the text of a document, select the level of detail you want, and the tool reviews the language to identify likely risk points, one-sided provisions, missing protections, and clauses that usually deserve closer human review.
The output is not a substitute for legal drafting or negotiated advice. It is a structured screening layer meant to help founders, operators, HR teams, procurement teams, and NGO teams spot issues earlier, ask better questions, and prepare for a more informed professional review where needed.
The clause highlighter looks for language patterns that often signal stronger obligations, broad indemnities, restrictive termination mechanics, unusual liability allocation, confidentiality concerns, or weak dispute-resolution wording. The compare mode helps users review two versions of a document side by side and understand whether each version appears to favour Party A, Party B, or remain relatively balanced on key commercial or legal points.
This tool is not tied to a single statute because contracts can span many subject areas. Its review logic is generally informed by core legal principles relevant to private agreements, such as contract formation, enforceability, obligations, remedies, termination rights, indemnity allocation, and dispute resolution.
For Indian users, the practical review context often overlaps with frameworks such as the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, labour and employment laws, data protection obligations, sector-specific compliance rules, and the governing law or forum clause written into the document itself.
Because enforceability depends on drafting, facts, jurisdiction, and current law, the tool should be treated as an educational risk-spotting aid rather than a definitive statement that a clause is valid, invalid, enforceable, or unlawful.
NDA review: If an NDA says the receiving party is liable for any disclosure by employees, consultants, affiliates, and systems without limitation, the tool may flag that as a broad risk allocation issue and suggest checking carve-outs, survival period, and permitted disclosures.
Employment agreement: If a contract allows termination without notice by the employer but imposes a long notice period on the employee, the tool may identify the clause as asymmetric and worth negotiating.
Vendor agreement: If indemnity, limitation of liability, and payment terms are all skewed toward one party, the tool can help highlight that the commercial balance of the agreement is not neutral even if each clause looks routine by itself.
Yes. The tool can help identify drafting patterns in agreements from many jurisdictions, but jurisdiction-specific enforceability still needs professional review.
No. It only means the pasted text appears less aggressive or problematic based on the screening logic. Commercial context and missing attachments can still materially change the position.
Most agreement types can work well for a first-pass review, including NDAs, employment contracts, consulting agreements, service agreements, founder agreements, vendor contracts, lease drafts, and many other commercial or policy-style documents.
Because negotiation strategy, transaction structure, enforceability, remedies, and risk allocation often depend on facts that no pasted-text tool can fully evaluate.
Use the score as a triage layer. It helps identify clauses worth reading first, but it does not decide whether the document is safe to sign or commercially acceptable.
The review is aimed at drafting patterns that often change risk allocation in contracts, policies and business documents.
Read the flagged clauses before editing the whole document. A medium-risk clause may still be acceptable if it matches the commercial bargain.
Human review matters where enforceability, litigation risk, regulatory exposure or high-value payment obligations are involved.
Note: This is an AI-assisted document triage tool. Review the full original document, attachments, governing law and commercial context before signing, filing or making a legal decision.
